To be an effective peer reviewer you will have to be well versed in various types and styles of essay writing. A peer review doesn’t just involve the optimal placement of ideas, correcting grammar, and fixing punctuation mistakes. But it involves looking our for logical fallacies and providing feedback on the strength of the content and the accuracy of reasoning.
Though the peer-reviewing process and the feedback, the essay writer can see the mistakes and faults that he or she made in the essay. The writer will thus, not only enhance the essay but also learn the areas of essays that the peer-reviewing targets moving a step closer to peer review for others.
By developing the peer reviewer’s eye for detail and errors you can always improve your own essays. Not every good essay writer is a peer reviewer, but every peer reviewer is a good essay writer.
The ‘Why’ question
It is important to know by, reading the introduction, why there was a need to discuss the topic at hand. The reviewer will see if the essay informs successfully about the significance of the topic at hand. Most importantly, it should communicate to the reader why it’s worth the reader’s attention. This can be the presence of a hook or other background information in the paragraph.
The thesis statement should be at the end of a build-up and the essay should be checked for. This gives the thesis it’s due center stage and makes it prominent in the introduction. The reviewer will look for the discernibility of the thesis statement.
The thesis statement should be checked if it introduces the claim or the stance taken by the essay writer. Remember, that the thesis should never be a statement but a claim that the writer has the intention to prove.
The methodology of convincing the reader about the claim should be explicitly stated. The reviewer will look for the presence of an outline for the readers to follow as move onto the body paragraphs such as the college essay writer will do.
The background information should be checked for involving information about the topic that hints at the need for further probing into the subject. It should not include any extra or redundant information, and every sentence and word should work to bring the topic from a general to specific.
The presence of topic sentences at the start of the paragraphs will be checked. The body paragraphs should have a logical flow — e.g moving from the point of least important to the most important.
The evidence will be scrutinized and it should be credible enough to show in the writing piece. Other than that it should be clear that the evidence earns its place by supporting the claims.
The counter-arguments should be credible and should work against the main thesis. The counterargument will then be checked for its validity during the review process. It is important to make sure that the thesis will always be superior in context to the counter-argument.
The conclusion should drive the message home by repeating the main claims in light of the thesis. The reviewer will check for any form of a call for action in the conclusion. It should hint at future developments or a need for further research and work into the topic at hand.
The citation should follow both directly quoted text or text that takes an idea from another’s work. The citation should be in a single format throughout.
The reviewer will make sure the essay has no grammatical errors. The pronouns should always refer to the correct subject, the voice should be active; the sentence structure should not impede the readers understanding same as essay writer free do.
Spelling and word-choice
There shouldn’t be any typos and errors and the word choice will always the strongest with strong nouns and strong verbs.